# Suggestions to have productive discussions about governance?

**URL:** <https://community.coops.tech/t/suggestions-to-have-productive-discussions-about-governance/2730>\
**Category:** General\
**Tags:** coops\
**Created:** [21 May 2021 09:22 UTC](https://community.coops.tech/t/suggestions-to-have-productive-discussions-about-governance/2730 "2021-05-21T09:22:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hamishcampbell](https://community.coops.tech/user_avatar/community.coops.tech/hamishcampbell/32/1566_2.png) [@Hamishcampbell](https://community.coops.tech/u/Hamishcampbell)\
**Post date:** [21 May 2021 13:34 UTC](https://community.coops.tech/t/suggestions-to-have-productive-discussions-about-governance/2730/8 "2021-05-21T13:34:57Z")

</div>

I find it interesting, and revealing, that nobody here actually talked about what the thried was about [Pages - openwebgovernancebody - Open Media Network](https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/Online-governance-)

If you can look outside your world view… We are doing a funding proposal to do the simple well tested project/workflow (which we know dues not scale) and roll it out trying federation to scale. We know this works to extent , look at the “Fediverse ” as a living example of this approach working to scale small to bigger.

Yes there will be lots of “smoke” and we could do with some help keeping the project clear of this.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.coops.tech/t/suggestions-to-have-productive-discussions-about-governance/2730)._
