# Examples of governing documents / handbooks / constitutions

**URL:** https://community.coops.tech/t/examples-of-governing-documents-handbooks-constitutions/101
**Category:** General
**Tags:** coops
**Created:** [26 May 2017 13:39 UTC](https://community.coops.tech/t/examples-of-governing-documents-handbooks-constitutions/101 "2017-05-26T13:39:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mixmix](https://community.coops.tech/user_avatar/community.coops.tech/mixmix/32/46_2.png) [@mixmix](https://community.coops.tech/u/mixmix)
#### Post date: [9 June 2017 00:02 UTC](https://community.coops.tech/t/examples-of-governing-documents-handbooks-constitutions/101/8 "2017-06-09T00:02:37Z")

</div>

**Re: Bun Protocol**  
The person from Crisp I was talking to emphasised that passing a _bun_ on didn’t involve any commission - since they were maximising happiness, not money. Seems to have built their community well.

**Re: subcontracting under other coops**  
Feels like this would be a good thread all in itself.

> [@Sub-contracting under other Coops](https://community.coops.tech/t/sub-contracting-under-other-coops/110):
>
> Context A major benefit to being part of a community of coops is that it smooths out contracting - surplus of work can be re-distrubuted to excellent humans. This is great for small coops who have not enough work or too much work. It’s also great for clients contacting the coops in the collective - they get guaranteed service and don’t need to be concerned with availability. Sharing work raises a bunch of questions. I see two broad cases: (A) the whole lead is passed to another coop (see [bun…](http://dna.crisp.se/docs/bun-protocol.html)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.coops.tech/t/examples-of-governing-documents-handbooks-constitutions/101)._